Un-Liberaled Woman

Barney Frank giving Code Pink a talking too during the AIG meetings, telling them to “grow up.”  Ummm, girlfriend, betta STEP OFF!

Although I completely agree with him (probably the ONLY time), I don’t know if the darlings of the far left are going to stand for this. (via HotAir)

Would you please act your age back there? Stop playing with that sign. If you have no greater powers of concentration, leave the room. We’re trying to have a serious discussion, which will include, you understand, a lot of criticism. We really need people to grow up. …

You, who stood up, who has the sign up … The next one that holds a sign up — it is distracting to people. I understand that there are some people for whom rational discussion is not an appropriate means of expressing themselves. You are entitled to do that in general, but not in a way that interrupts those of us who are trying to have rational discussions. So the next one who holds a sign will be ejected. Uh, I do not know how you think you advance any cause to which you might be attached by this kind of silliness.

Oh, snap!! Spoke too soon…

UPDATE: Frank’s probably back in the good graces of the far left by calling Supreme Court Justice Scalia a “homophobe.” (via Townhall) And as a classic liberal, he offers no actual support or evidence to this false accusation.  He uses tangents, not Scalia’s own words, to make an extremist argument for himself probably with the only objective of getting him in the media’s spotlight.

If you look at what actually Scalia says, instead of Frank’s Calvin & Hobbes’ interpretation, Scalia only opposes the idea of judges legislating from the bench. Scalia makes no mention of calling homosexuals “bad people” as Frank says. Scalia has problems with these laws not being defined by the legislature, which according to the Constitution is the appropriate governing branch to write the law. The judge’s (or the judicial branch) responsibility is to defend, interpret or uphold the law based on what the legislature writes into law. Scalia never says he has problems with homosexuals or gay marriage personally or as a law, just that judges have no place professionally in taking a side in the culture/moral debate on gay marriage or laws relating to behaviors of homosexuals. In his view, that is the legislature’s job. So Frank’s homophobe claim in inaccurate – which, GAAAAAAAAAAASP!, isn’t surprising.

Also, watch at around the 4:16 mark where Roberts asks Frank about whether Democrats, in the actual legislature, who are not supportive of gay marriage, and expressed so through voting against the gay marriage agenda, are then in his eyes homophobes. Please cue the classic liberal answer: No.

Why? Well, Frank doesn’t give a reason but I bet I can spell it out for you. Because they are L-I-B-E-R-A-L.  As Ann Coulter has stated and proven multiple times – there is one set of rules for liberals and another set for those they don’t agree with. Even if, EVEN IF, Scalia did say the lies Frank says, how does that give Frank a right to demonize him – Why? Because he disagrees with him on an ideological level? Pahhleaze!