Hell hath no fury like a former liberal woman.
I read the President’s speech to school kids today. My verdict – trust me, I already no you don’t care or probably don’t agree – that overall it’s probably what most administrators should be telling students themselves. I don’t think it’s a perfect speech – that’s not possible.
But here are two key passages from the speech that I think are vital:
“And no matter what you want to do with your life, I guarantee that you’ll need an education to do it. You want to be a doctor, or a teacher, or a police officer? You want to be a nurse, or an architect, a lawyer or a member of our military? You’re going to need a good education for every single one of those careers. You can’t drop out of school and just drop into a good job. You’ve got to work for it and train for it and learn for it.”
‘But at the end of the day, the circumstances of your life – what you look like, where you come from, how much money you have, what you’ve got going on at homes – that’s no excuse for neglecting your homework or having a bad attitude. That’s no excuse for talking back to your teacher, or cutting class, or dropping out of school. That’s no excuse for not trying.”
To me this is a fine speech to give to kids. There are things I don’t think are necessary – ‘I hope you’ll wash your hands a lot’ – but to me, there are no major issues of the speech. That said, I don’t have kids so if I were in that position I might feel differently. AND, I think the bigger question throughout this entire issue is:
Why do government (public) schools have to rely on the President to relay this message -about working hard and getting your homework done – that they should already be responsible for promoting to our children in the first place?
Answer – because our government school system is broken, broken, broken. But that’s another topic for another day. The silver lining is that at least the message is getting out there – put down the Xbox and pick up the calculator.
And for those who are chastising parents who have opposition to the President’s speech and are electing to not have their kids in school that day. Where was your outcry when this statement was made?
“The Department of Education should not be producing paid political advertising for the president, it should be helping us to produce smarter students. And the president should be doing more about education than saying, ‘Lights, camera, action’.”
- Richard Gephardt (Democrat), then the House Majority Leader on George H.W. Bush’s speech to school children in 1991
I’m not putting that up there to get down in the hypocrisy hoe-down. But honestly, people need to quit yammering about parents who have elected their free choice in THEIR kids’ attendance to school today. Most of us who went to college skipped school to nurse binge drinking hangovers and didn’t think twice about it. Now all of a sudden a parent is active in their son/daughter’s education and because we don’t agree with their choice it’s okay to label them as bad parents. Who are WE to judge them in the fucking first place! Most of us aren’t even parents ourselves.
Do I agree with them pulling their children out of school? No because I don’t really have a problem with the speech. But I do respect their choice as parents. Most of the parents I know who are taking their kids out of school are using the time to teach their kids about government and other lesson plans they believe are vital to their kids well being and education. How do I know this? Because I participated in this thing called communicating and asked them.
Most of these parents are some of the most active, involved parents I have ever met. Yet, I keep seeing and hearing others treat these people as if they have the parenting skills of Britney Spears speeding down the LA freeway with her infant child sitting on her lap with no seatbelt. Please, give me a break. Even Britney thinks it’s humorous in the photo op she provided for this post (FYI – that’s a tongue-in-cheek remark for those who didn’t get it).
SIT DOWN with your cries of chastising these people as intolerant and take the time to inquire about why they are choosing this path, what they plan to do with their children while they are out of school, etc. Today on the radio I even heard The Drex Show state that the actions of these parents might be racially-biased. Parents take kids out of school for much more vapid reasons, yet we’re choosing this to get on parents about??? Come on. (Rolling MAH eyes.)
The President was fulfilling his duties of the office by giving this speech to kids on the first day of school. I wish every President – both Republican and Democrat – would do this more often because kids need all the guidance they can get especially those who don’t have involved parents.
In a world where the likes of Paris Hilton (shudders) is for SOME reason idolized, I think the office of the President (regardless of his policies that I don’t agree with) is still a good role model for children. As long as teachers are not using it as a stepping stone to preach their own politics in the classroom, I don’t really have a problem with it. But I wish that people would be respectful of those who choose and don’t choose to participate in these events. The only thing the negativity brings is fuel to our overbloated egos, making judgments where really we have no business spouting off our mouths.
The ranting and raving of a woman formally brainwashed under the liberal agenda. Through investigation, commentary and sarcasm about government, this woman is breaking free of the hypocritical liberal party that tries to manipulate women into believing only they can represent women’s rights. Get informed, get free, get Un-Liberaled! This blog does not endorse any particular candidate or party - although if I did, I most likely wouldn’t endorse a liberal candidate. For instance, Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) or as I like to call her Smancy Pelotox would not get my vote. Comprende? Good. Hope you enjoy the rants! :)
Pumpkin
September 8th, 2009 at 10:18 am
I read the speech and did not see a problem with it, my child attends a Christian Private school so they were not showing the speech. If the speech was being viewed at her school I would have allowed her to view it. I DO NOT agree with Mr. Obama’s views or agenda and I believe he is a Radical. I think he kept that side of him hidden from the words in his speech, though I could probably pick it apart if I really wanted to. My child has been in public education in the past and I have to say the teachers were great, the school was great it was the behavior of the other children that lead to us taking her out of public and putting her in private. A majority of the children that were in her school were there from the time the doors opened in the morning for breakfast to the time the doors closed after the school was finished with their after school programs. I believe because of this the children see school as a day care rather then an institution for learning. I also believe that a majority of parents are not involved enough in their own child’s education. The teacher can only do so much in the classroom and having to redirect a child because of his/her behavior is only a distraction to the other children that are there to learn.
g. jones
September 8th, 2009 at 12:54 pm
The main problem as I see it is that a lot of folks don’t trust this president to NOT be political. Shades of Fidel.