Hell hath no fury like a former liberal woman.
It’s Monday, it’s early, but this video is that good. It’s not even 9 am CST and I’ve listened to it twice! Man, this guy sounds awesome!!!!
Wish I was in Florida’s 22nd Congressional District to vote for him. Lt. Colonel Allen West gives a much needed rallying cry at an event. Here’s hoping this video makes the rounds of the blogsphere and hopefully the media. Also, good luck MS-NBC unfairly labeling this guy a racist, even though he’s saying what those a tea parties have been saying for months. Video via Ace of Spades:
Hoooooooooo-rah!!!!
Ohhh…found another video of West at a townhall meeting, one he held after his opponent (the Deomcrat incumbent) refused to debate healthcare with him or have a townhall of his own for his constituents.
Oooooooooh, Ed Begley, Jr., if only you would have had a crystal ball the other week. Perhaps you would have rethought statements like this when somebody points out that maybe global warming “science” should be met with strong skepticism:
“Peer-reviewed studies. Those are the key words here. If these scientists have done something wrong, it will be found out and their peers will determine it….and if it does come out in peer-reviewed studies that there are some cooking of the books that will come out.”
Oh, the cooking of the books came out alright, but not because of the peer-review methodology. Because of some miracle hackers who weren’t going to take a ‘Ph.D.’ label as the ultimate authority on climate “science.” In fact, it seems the peer review measure is what caused the cover-up of falsified and manipulated data. Goooooooooo peer reviews!
Don’t you just love it when liberals shoot themselves in the foot. (via Ace of Spades)
This is what happens when you base a movement in shady science and defame reasonable skeptics as being against what you deem the “truth.” These leaders on the global warming front remind me of this passage in Liberal Fascism by Jonah Goldberg (emphasis mine):
But {Georges] Sorel’s greatest contribution to the left – and Mussolini in particular – lay elsewhere: in his conception of “myths,” which he defined as “artificial combination invented to give the appearance of reality to hopes that inspire men in their present activity.”
As Mussolini said in an interview in 1932, “It is faith that moves mountains, not reason. Reason is a tool but it can never be the motive force of the crowd.” This kind of thinking has been commonplace on the left ever since. Think of Al Sharpton when allegedly confronted by the fact that the Tawana Brawley “assault” was a fake. “It doesn’t matter” he’s reported to have said. “We’re building a movement.”
I take those historical accounts, and look at the reaction of those politicians and academics who continue to blindly defend the “science” of global warming. Makes me wonder if history will always repeat itself and when will people WAKE up to these hysteria movements that are created only to make a few people rich on the fears of the masses. Does that mean we forget recycling and being environmentally conscience? No. But it is also means there’s no need for demagogue-style lecturing and governmental enforcement of energy policies (that drive up prices for consumers) on the sole basis of clearly falsified “science.”
And you make my heart flutter as always. So my arch nemesis (in mah head), Joy “Yackity-Yak” Behar, was all over the Tiger Woods scandal the other day on everyone’s true source for intelligent, analytical opinions (pfffffffff) The View. I’m not opposed to this hen-fest discussing the Tiger Woods scandal. It’s a talk show for crying out loud. What does amaze me is how once again Behar pulls at my heart strings with “logic” like this – only those who are anti-gay marriage or right-wingers can be hypocritical when they betray their marriage vows.
Here’s the full video (caution, get ready to fall in love, conservatives – heh). (via HotAir)
Yes, Tiger Woods is a professional athlete and is paid based on both his athletic accomplishments and reputation management. Part of that reputation management is based on the fact he is a family man. Reputation management is key to sponsorship compensation – just ask Michael Irvin, Kobe Bryant or Allen Iverson (strong athletic careers, poor reputation = lower sponsorship/compensation). The fact that he’s compensated for his reputation doesn’t make him off limits in the arena of public scrutiny. Did Woods do something hypocritical? Not in my eyes. To me hypocritical would be him lecturing others to do one action while himself doing the exact opposite. If Woods declared publically that men should be faithful to their wives and respect their marriage vows, that would make him a hypocrite. He did no such thing. However, not being a hypocrite doesn’t equate Woods being off limits when it comes to the media spotlight and the praise OR criticism that comes with it.
You don’t get to promote your family photos to the media to receive praise, inviting the public into your private life during good times, and then cry foul when the media wants the same availability to inquire when the going gets tough in you’re private life and you’re open to heavy criticism. In that regard, one could make an argument for Woods’ hypocrisy. I just think the guy wants his cake and to eat it too (like most celebrities), and that somebody in his camp gave him bad advice in terms of reputation management.
But this post is about Joy – how dare I get off track!!!! The thing is that Behar herself doesn’t seem to understand is what the definition of hypocrisy ACTUALLY is and again just emulates how people shouldn’t take her “arguments” in the arena of politics seriously. I know – shooooooockah! Using any opportunity to label right-wingers as hypocrites while having no factual OR relevant basis for doing so doesn’t show negatively on those “evil” right-wingers, Behar. It only shows how much of an idiot and ideological demagogue you are. So keep wooooooooooooorkin’ that tin foil hat, GIRL!
Thanks, Goracle. I guess one fraudulent claim this century wasn’t enough for you.
I’m SHOCKED! I tell you, SHOCKED! that you would back out of a pedestal-lifting, self-glorification opportunity when the sh*t hit the fan and your “inconvenient truth” was exposed. Where’s the Goracle magic I’ve come to loathe all these years. How. can. I. go. on w/o a Goracle fix!!!!!
I suppose I’ll just have to use my $1,200 on something else frivolous like investing in a new gas-guzzling, but life-style convenient SUV.
Name: Donnie Deutsch Douchebag
Political Fame: Being an ignoramus yapping “political pundit” sometimes featured on MS-NBC’s Morning Joe
Political Affiliation: Typical, pseudo-self-loathing, limo liberal
Why Political Boob of the Week? (You say) It’s only a Monday!!!! But I felt it was well-deserved since prior to 6:30 a.m CST on Morning Joe this socialism idiot called conservatives racists, Nazis and fascists all in one rant. And this is somebody who labels himself a “progressive.” Like I say, in America today one man’s definition of progressive is another man’s definition of a fascist.
The thing that kills me is that Donnie Douchebag’s qualifications for being a political pundit are…oh, wait that’s right he has no former political experience outside of being a former ad man and failed TV host who’s only noteworthy moment came from a heated debate with Ann Coulter over Jews vs. Christians (to which I ask WHY was there a debate in the first place???).
Gee, Mr. Douche, last time I checked was it conservatives that were trying to repeal the 22nd amendment to keep their party in executive power, or tried to create indoctrination in the school system, or enforce religion to take a second-class seat to government despite a constitutional right to freedom of religion????
Yeah, it doesn’t sound right because its those in the far left category of the political spectrum that pursue these things. And you have the balls of a chihuahua (hmmm, that’s a compliment!) to sit there and declare conservatives as Nazis? If I were a Jew, I’d be completely embarrassed by your ignorant and arrogant false accusations. What a belittling you do to the contextual and historical depth of the evil that Hitler and the Nazi’s reign did to the world when you settle to using them as a comparison/metaphor due to your lack of intelligence in rebuttals of our free-minded, democratic political parties.
Shame on you for being so boobalicious you make Pam Anderson jealous.
And people have the AUDACITY to lie about how the government (and mostly the far left) does butt its abusive authority *cough*enforcement
*cough* onto churches thus violating a freedom of religion constitutional right (in my book at least).
Came across this video of how government is now telling churches they cannot practice giving to the poor via feeding them as most churches do around the holidays.
Hey, Tiny Tim….it’s a FASCIST MIRACLE! (via Hot Air)
I don’t 100% agree with Meghan McCain on a ton of issues, but she couldn’t have stated my feelings about Commander-of-Self Delusions (aka President Unicorn Princess) any better than this:
Let me be frank—I am angry. I am angry and frustrated, in a way I haven’t been in a long time. During the election, I remember the biggest fear I had about an Obama presidency was his lack of experience in foreign policy and specifically with the military….As the fighting in Afghanistan continues to escalate, I can’t help but believe that soldiers are being left behind both by this administration and the media. The media has seemingly lost interest in these wars and doesn’t give them the proper coverage they deserve. On the same day CNN was producing news breaks about my cleavage in a Twitter picture, 14 soldiers had just died in Afghanistan. As Obama stalls and hesitates to make decisions, these soldiers in Afghanistan are not being given the support they need. General Stanley McChrystal and other military leaders have asked for an additional 40,000 troops to expand the fighting in Afghanistan. And this Tuesday, President Obama will lay out his plans for the region.
Seriously, I don’t know how many times in 2008 I brought up Obama’s inexperience with military affairs and that in the end our soldiers would be the ones to suffer the most from it. I don’t want to be an oracle, but seriously, what the F*CK is taking this guy so long to make a decision on troop levels????
For a person who said this:
he sure doesn’t seem to understand now the importance of military decisions now that he’s off the sing ‘n dance campaign trail.
Obama now looks like Carl Spackler in his decision making process to pertinent military affairs in a war that is “the central front on terrorism.” And what’s sad is that I’m not joking, this is “actual footage” from the Oval Office (heh).
Wait, maybe I’m being to harsh. Pfffffff. No, how about some leader (I’m not naming names!) get a clue that playing golf is NOT a higher priority than talking to your generals in the middle of a war zone.
The gopher from Caddyshack is probably a better commander-in-chief than this guy. At least it knows how to maneuver around its enemy with quick-on-its-feet decision making AND still has time to bust some sweet moves to some Kenny Loggins.
Good choice in vote there you nitwitted 52%, good one!
But you know what, I’m sure SOME WAY, SOME HOW his less-than-mediocrity of making a @#$@#$!@##!@ decision in regards to troop levels is Bush’s fault. And for those of us who dare disagree with his decision process (like pointing out his inexperience is really to blame) we’ll all be labeled racists and fascists by the likes of MS-NBC.
Hooooooooooope ‘n Chaaaaaaaaange!
Cause, like it’s any different (no offense to South Park).
I’m so irritated with the blind, drooling adulation of Jon “Liberal Squire”‘ Stewart by my liberal friends. The Daily Show runs a 5-minute segment that consists of fragmented “evidence” or news clips to support sarcastic jabs and people start taking this crap as real news????
I don’t have a problem with The Daily Show in general. I actually watch it and do find it humorous, even when he cracks jokes at Fox and conservatives. But that’s my point – I watch it for pure entertainment while liberals watch it as a way to provide some type of logic to their illogical musings. Why not just say fuck it to researching information all together and watch nothing but SNL, the Colbert Report and South Park to solely base all your political ideology on.
If we continue on this trend, I just can’t wait to see how long it takes us until “Oww, My Balls” cracks the Nielson charts.
Instead of picking up a book and learning something, yeah, let’s listen to the sage advice of someone who prior to The Daily Show was on a slippery slope down within the comedy circuit.
In the words of Matt Stone and Trey Parker – Waaaaaaaaay to go, YOU! (and I say that with my eyes closed)
I’m having problems uploading some of my favorite SP clips, so I’ll do so when I get home (stupid work – kidding, dear bosses!). But go over to Trying to Grok to check out a classic one in the meantime. Then be sure to post to your FB page like any good liberal and use that as your sole basis to somehow justify an entire, complex political issue. Waaaay to go!
I almost have to laugh thinking back on all the classes I took on ethics and journalism (and public relations as well). Seriously, it’s like Joey Gladstone: Cut. IT. OUUUUUT.
Friends of mine over at Facebook have been bringing up some interesting evidence in regards to how apparent the media cares about the “pertinent” news affecting Americans (you know, those people who are THEIR AUDIENCE!). Via The Wall Street Journal (emphasis mine):
An Associated Press dispatch, written by Erica Werner and Richard Alonso-Zaldivar, compares the House and Senate ObamaCare bills. We’d like to compare this dispatch to the AP’s dispatch earlier this week “fact checking” Sarah Palin’s new book. Here goes:
Number of AP reporters assigned to story:
• ObamaCare bills: 2
• Palin book: 11
Number of pages in document being covered:
• ObamaCare bills: 4,064
• Palin book: 432
Number of pages per AP reporter:
• ObamaCare bill: 2,032
• Palin book: 39.3
On a per-page basis, that is, the AP devoted 52 times as much manpower to the memoir of a former Republican officeholder as to a piece of legislation that will cost trillions of dollars and an untold number of lives. That’s what they call accountability journalism.
People are screaming left and right for more details about this massive healthcare boondoggle, and THIS is what the media is reporting on.
Gee, way to go there, Norah, with your hard hitting journalism. I love how the guy at the end of the clip also takes time bring O’Donnell’s own misinterpretation to light. O’Donnell vetted a tween who probably cares as much as Edward Cullen as she does Sarah Palin’s new book, but when it comes to exposing federally-funded organizations promoting illegal sex-trade rings she suddenly turns investigative reporting into “entrapment.” Yeah, goooo, Norah, goooooo! You’re only a few million steps from that “well-deserved” Peabody.
And yet liberals are flabbergasted like a DJ “Oh Mylanta” Tanner when you talk about the obvious liberal bias (or bias in general) in the media.
I remember hearing non-stop in 2008 how Obama was so qualified because he was so “cultured” and more of a “citizen of the world.” Yeah, I threw up a little bit in my mouth too.
So, fast-forward to my NON-surprise when President Unicorn Princess can’t seem to get standard world leadership customs right. I’m sure his kool-aid devotees will channel this up to something like CHANGE! but I have a incline it’s due more to that thing called inexperience I vocalized to their ‘cultured” appellations.
Below a video outlining photographic evidence on how PUP is not invoking change but just having no sense or respect for diplomatic customs. Citizen of the world – my ass!
The ranting and raving of a woman formally brainwashed under the liberal agenda. Through investigation, commentary and sarcasm about government, this woman is breaking free of the hypocritical liberal party that tries to manipulate women into believing only they can represent women’s rights. Get informed, get free, get Un-Liberaled! This blog does not endorse any particular candidate or party - although if I did, I most likely wouldn’t endorse a liberal candidate. For instance, Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) or as I like to call her Smancy Pelotox would not get my vote. Comprende? Good. Hope you enjoy the rants! :)