Un-Liberaled Woman

Ever dealt with one of those people that refuses to see their part of blame in things gone wrong? Somehow their idea of accepting responsibility basically just boils down to them accusing others and/or pointing out their faults in the situation. “I know I’m wrong but ultimately this happened because of you…yada, yada…”, yeah, and I was totally born yesterday. Pahleaze, that’s not taking responsibility. That’s just being a blow-hard who’s trying to use scapegoating as a diversion technique to shield themselves from actually having to take any responsibility whatsoever.

It seems that President Unicorn Princess can’t face the fact that he is messing up all over the place, big time. And instead of facing the music like a BIG BOOOOOOOOOY! he continues to just blame others all while sugar coating it as him “taking responsibility”:

Economy – Bush’s fault (despite Obama’s scare tactics of the worst economy ever making the market plunge even further during the campaign, oh, and passing a non-stimulus porkulus bill, and proposing a deficit-neutral-but-really-a-deficit-expanding budget, and implementing Karl Marx-steps to take over private enterprises, OH and appointing tax cheats to lead the Treasury)

Healthcare – Capitalism’s fault (despite Obama’s lying about the bankruptcy and ineffectiveness of Medicare, using faulty statistics of the “47 million uninsured,” ignoring that the mass public is 86% happy with their healthcare AS IS, and striking money deals using blackmail to buy sham endorsements of Obamacare)

Terrorism – Amercia’s-before he became the HBIC – fault (I’m sooooooooowwwry, so sooooooooowry, Europe! Look assmunch, you’re the leader of this country, not Europe. So quit groveling. When you’re standing up for citizens more outside the border than inside, time to then take a good look in the mirror)

Accusing Professional Cops of Acting “Stupidly” and Defending Gate’s Race Card Politics – the media’s fault (even though the question was clearly pre-arranged, even though he said the remarks “acted stupidly” and “cooler heads could have prevailed” about the cops – who were the only ones acting mature in the situation – it’s somehow still not his fault but mark.his.words…. he’s taken responsibility)

Oh, but don’t just take it at face value, folks. It may be in the fine print or between the lines. I swear by Robert Gibbs’ ability to control a WH press briefing effectively, Obama sure is setting a fine example of how you take responsibility for your actions. (Pfffffffffffffff!)

You know what I think it is:

Obama being the worst President since Jimmy Carter – 52% of American’s fault

No, I’m not talking about the ones that are free off of the McDonald’s menu.

It’s the latest in Wedding Video dance crazes. All over Facebook today, to the tune of Forever (let’s just everybody awkwardly ignore the fact this is sung by psssssst, you know who!).

I’m gettin this video from the FB friend Kenneth. Sometimes no matter how cheesy you just need it to make the day better:

And yes, I’m dorkishly bouncing around in my chair because that’s how you dance it up in the cube farm!

I’ve followed my friend Trying To Grok’s experiences in the military, government-run healthcare system for some time now.  While I’m not saying this is every experience of every military spouse out there, it is clear that there are huge problems with government-run programs.

I have been surprised at how many people were shocked that I shared an ultrasound room. Is it because it’s a military hospital? I’ve never tried to have a baby anywhere else. But there’s always been more than one person in the room when I’ve been there for an ultrasound, just never someone so loud and obnoxious.

But like I need any convincing on the failure of govt-run programs, I’m an avid watcher who compares my 401k vs. “my” Social Security accounts. But for those that need a good dose of reality, I ask you – if you were expecting a child, and had the choice of sharing an ultrasound room or getting a private one which would you choose? I have no doubt you’d prefer privacy for a test so sensitive to you and your child’s health. But now, what if you remove choice from the situation. What if you had no choice and were forced to share a room due to rationing of space because hospitals could no longer afford to have private ultrasound rooms since big, bad government came along and took away those evil things called profits (dun, dun, dunnnnnnnnnnnnnn!).

I heard someone the other day literally cheer on Obama about how he was going to fix healthcare because he was going to take away profits. Good F#$%@#$%^#$%@ing night, morons! Hate to break the news but profits are not minions of the Devil (Capitalism is the Deeeeeeeeevil!). No, profits are what make us have 21st-century care in the 21st-fucking-century. Take away profits and guess what, you’re not only now decades behind in even sub-standard techniques, but also not able to create any innovation that betters our well being and lives.

Ah, but don’t we all just feel better knowing we’re doing what’s “good” for the collective?  Say it with me -  Marx! Marx! He’s our man! If he can’t do it, no one can!

I digress. Anyactinglikealiberalarguingwithtangents, here’s one account (and really not even the most horrifying – click the link above to read the entire story):

I was supposed to get a phone consultation with the doctor and a prescription filled.  I called at 10 AM and left a message.  I called at noon and left another message on a different machine.  An hour later, I got a call back from one nurse, saying she’d follow up and make sure my prescription got filled.  At 2 PM, I called the advice nurse and asked if she knew what was going on.  At 3:30, the advice nurse goes home.  At 4:20, no one is answering the phones in reception any more.  At 4:30, you can no longer leave messages on voicemail.  I called the pharmacy: no prescription had been called in.  And now it was the weekend.  My mother said, “You mean NO ONE is available to help you on the weekend?”

My mother was freaking out.  “This is how things work for you?  You haven’t talked to a human being all day long, just answering machines!”  But for me, this was totally normal.  I never talk to human beings when I call the hospital.  I don’t even know how to call a human being, save the advice nurse.  In fact, that’s why I called her in the afternoon, just because she’s the only human being I know how to reach!  My mom was shocked that someone, anyone!, didn’t call me during the day to let me know what was going on.

My husband called from Iraq at 5:15 PM to see how things were going.  Five minutes later, the doctor beeped in.  I had to hang up with my husband from Iraq to talk to the doctor!  If that doesn’t suck, I don’t know what does.

Can you imagine that – your husband is defending the Constitution of this country and working to keep peace in this world and our freaking government doesn’t have the decency to be effective for its own citizens who sacrifice the most for this country. If this is how our government treats those who they supposedly “support” the most, what does that say for the rest of us? Shudders.

So making the headlines these days is this story out of Cambridge where a man got arrested for disorderly conduct and then accused the police officers of racism because he’s an Ivy-edumacted man, and oh black. Notice, one of the police officers at the scene was also wait for it – B-L-A-C-K! I’m sure there was massive crimes of racism being committed as that officer stood by (eyes roooooooollin’).

Here’s the gist of the story:

A woman in her neighborhood saw two men trying to beat down a door of a local house. Probably being a woman and not knowing who the men were, she didn’t want to do nothing so called the police to warn them about a possible community crime, disturbance, what have you. Trust me, if this was going on in your neighborhood (and you didn’t recognize the people breaking in a door and you felt uneasy about approaching them yourself) you’d probably do the same thing because that’s the decent neighborly thing to do when it comes to protecting your community. Turns out the guy breaking in was the owner of the house. But when the police showed up to make sure everything was okay, instead of just cooperating with police by showing his id, the guy took the opportunity to go basically bat shit crazy like a Lohan on meth. It was more important for this guy to insult the officer who was trying to protect this guy’s community (and HIS HOME!) than for him to be cooperative.

What IF it wasn’t the owner, Gates, but an actual criminal breaking in the house and the police didn’t show up – my guess is this “professor” on race relations would then bitch and moan about the police not doing their job because they are racist toward the black man. Good grief. With people like this, you just can’t win because they will always try to find a way to make it about them being a victim of some sort.  Oh, and before anyone goes jumping on the conclusions map like Obama did a la Office Space, here’s the actual police report. (via Smoking Gun) Click the link for the full thing, here is the second page with all the good stuff.

Yeah, I bet Gates was cool, calm and collected. When the officer asked to see identification to make sure he was the owner of the house and Gates responded with “Why? Because I’m a black man in America!” (and refused to cooperate with police) he did so in just a calm, misunderstood way. Right.

Please this guy is an asshole, and you can be an asshole even if you’re purple. And if you’re a purple asshole who spends more time running your mouffffffffff off at investigating police officers (who are just doing their job making sure that all is right in the community because they got an emergency call about a possible breakin), then guess what – you’re ass gets arrested for disorderly conduct. Because that’s what disorderly conduct is:

Intentionally causing public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly causing a risk, conduct that disturbs the peace or endangers the morals, health, or safety of a community.

Or for a finer example, let’s turn to one of my dad’s favorite shows, COPS.  Let’s take an example of what disorderly conduct looks like when arrested:

Gates and Obama (for jumping to conclusions when he should have been politically correct and said “no comment”) should be ashamed of themselves (via HotAir). Of course Obama’s team is now doing massive backstrokes about his “officers acting stupidly” comment at the press conference before he chose to review ANY facts.

How could we have assumed that when Obama accused the cops of acting stupidly that we thought he meant they were stupid?  And Eastasia has always been at war with Oceania, Winston.

While I’m not denying there are forms of racism in this country, it’s the overzealous reactions of people so quick to pull out the victim card that they end up watering down what we as a society define as racism. It would be the same if we started calling tulips, crabgrass, and lilies all the word rose. The actual roses would not exude as strong a tie in definition to the word rose if we applied it more and more to things that weren’t really an accurate representation of it. Instead we’ve got people jumping up to defend Gates without first taking a look at the facts, because they’re so eager to have a leg to stand on with a weak argument (ie, that America is just one big racist against blacks).

Oh, and interesting too that in the midst of this Gates is trying to promote a documentary on racism in America. Opportunistic ego-maniac, say whaaaaaaaaaat? Yeah, he’s totally legit in his claims. No bias here folks. If you believe that then BTW I am your savior! and you must give me a million dollars.

In the post below about the Gods, Guns, and Guts promotion I thought about it more when the CNN reporter smirked (literally in a snooty voice) about the dealership owners putting the word “GOD” in his promotion. I know the reporter is trying to get at a “how DARE you put religion out in the public eye!”

I’m so tired of this crusade against anyone who not only wants to practice religion but also wants to voice their practice/admiration of their religion.

I don’t think this dealer is marketing hybrids to smug a-holes in San Francisco. He’s marketing honk-a-burn’-love monster trucks to country boys in the sticks (aka God’s Country by the locals). Everytime my husband and I go visit his folks that remark is made more than once during the trip down – we’re almost to God’s Country (aka small town, middle of nowhere Indiana).

If the dealership owner wants to put God in his promotion to drum up sales, so be it. If you don’t like religion here’s a thought – ignore the promotion, pass over it. I don’t think you were his target audience in the first place then.

BTW, this totally reminds me of that episode on South Park. It’s literally one of my favorites. Where the liberals of San Fran are so smug in their egos because they all drive hybrids, that they have no shame in smelling their own farts. Classic, yet so on target.

Here’s the commentary on the inspiration for that episode. I just love Matt Stone and Trey Parker – isn’t it funny how it just comes down to common sense.

Listening to their story, you can just imagine these liberals thinking they’re doing something sooooo great by buying a hybrid car – as if they’ve helped save the Earfffffffffffff (and I just said that with my eyes closed – closed due to a massive eye roll, but still closed)

So here’s this interview with the “controversial” dealership owner from Missouri whose latest truck dealership offering is that with every truck purchase, they get a rebate to a local gun dealer for an AK-47. (via The God Blog) Of course, the liberal elitist reporter advocate against anything not on the Upper East side of Manhattan, lays into the owner about how it’s not necessary for people to own AK-47s. The dealership owner comes back with some awesome retorts:

Like the guy said, they’re not loading up illegal guns in the back seat as people drive the trucks off the lot. No, they have to go through legal means to get the guns in the first place. As to the type of gun that argument is irrelevant. It’s the right to bear arms, not the right to bear only a particular defense choice decided by liberal elitists. A bullet is still a piece of hot metal discharged out of a metal gun, no matter the type of gun being used. Some just make the bullets go faster and more of them when it comes to protecting yourself, your family and home. Plus some just look more badass, and why argue with that! (KIDDING!!! Awww- oh don’t want to offend any nambie-pambies)

My husband and I went down to North Carolina to visit some friends who were stationed there with the military. Being military folk, they happen to have a gun collection. I got a couple pics of course with their AK-47. (Just in case, there were no bullets and the safety was on, so no danger was posed.)

BTW, nothing says badass than living vicariously through our military families for at least two minutes of heaven posing with heavy artillery.

Anyposer, after our visit my husband and I were discussing whether there was a lot of crime around their area just because it’s a known military area and that if we were criminals we would know not to mess around because it’d probably not end well in favor of the criminal activity. Then sure enough the next day we heard a report on the radio about a burglar that got shot breaking into the house of a military family who protected themselves by shooting the burglar.

People in urban areas forget what it’s like living in rural or small-town America. The police aren’t always available and no matter how great they are, like the dealership owner points out, sometimes you only have seconds to defend yourself – not enough time to even dial 911 let alone wait for them. So to the reporter and those like her who say they understand the plight of 2nd amendment, do yourself a favor and listen before talking. You might learn something!  If you’re allowed to drive in the limo of your choice, then folks should be able to choose the gun of their choice to protect themselves when done through legal channels.

Here’s the problem with playing race-card/identity politics. At some point, you’re going to slam your foot into your mouth with a “wise [insert race here]” moment. For Sotomayor, it was a “wise-Latina” could draw on their experiences to be more intelligent or compassionate on certain rulings. For Obama, it’s now that “wise-African Americans” understand the American experience more than I guess say other races because “they don’t have a recent immigrant experience to draw on.” (via Mediaite)

That’s part of the African American experience. You are, in some ways, connected to this distant land, but on the other end, you’re about as American as it gets in some ways. African Americans are more fundamentally rooted in the American experience because they don’t have a recent immigrant experience to draw on. It’s that unique African American culture that has existed in North America for hundreds of years long before we actually founded the nation.

You’ve got to be fucking kidding me!

Newsflash to Captain Ethnocentrist, but a major part of the American experience IS about the immigrant experience. Stating otherwise doesn’t make you wise or delivering rhetorical elegance. No, this type of boneheaded remark means you’re talking before thinking.  And what about those races that endured indentured servitude. While not the same as slavery, it still meant you were raked over the coals in terms of work production and basically working toward your freedom, the only real difference being it had a time limit, although this time frame was abused on many occasions. Many Germans, Scottish, Irish and English went through this type of slavery-light.

And let’s not forget about Hispanics, who today comprise of our county’s biggest immigrant population, yet based on your illogical reasoning it’s somehow African-Americans who are rooted in America MORE???

This totally goes back to Michelle Obama’s “proud for the first time in my adult life” of America backhanded comment. Spread that guilt, spread it.

One race over another doesn’t make anybody, ANYBODY, more wise, intelligent, compassionate or relatable to what it means to be American. The beauty of America is that we can all define that concept without competing to be the epitome of what defines American. I know that’s hard for some to get, but it’s the truth.  I’m no more American than my blue-collar Dad or my white-collar friends or Bill Gates or the panhandler outside the Chicago Metra station. Neither is Obama. Neither is the black race over the Latino race, or the WASPs.

Either we’re all created equal or we are not – get the story straight, or admit that you’re cherry picking because underneath it all you’re basically a ethnocentrist bigot! What about the everyday man in middle America – I guess his ability to relate to the spirit of American only matters on the campaign trail when you’re visiting taverns in the country of Pennsylvania and Indiana. Typical blue donkey ass elitist.

The ego of this obliviot astounds me more and more each day.

UPDATE: Apparently it’s blown out of proportion according to Allahpundit. While I can be convinced by his argument, the fact of the matter remains that Democrats don’t make it hard to jump to these conclusions when they have a track record with reverse racism (see Sen. Boxer, Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr., etc.). It doesn’t help too that Obama sat in a church for 20+ years while propaganda sermons of black power were spewed from the pulpit by good ol’ Rev. Wright.

Remember when this Hope n’ Change administration was supposed to be the new era of transparency….Er, not so fast jack! This is on a bunch of blogs today, but I’ll source it at the AP and also HotAir.com…

The White House is being forced to acknowledge the wide gap between its once-upbeat predictions about the economy and today’s bleak landscape. The administration’s annual midsummer budget update is sure to show higher deficits and unemployment and slower growth than projected in President Barack Obama’s budget in February and update in May, and that could complicate his efforts to get his signature health care and global-warming proposals through Congress.

The release of the update — usually scheduled for mid-July — has been put off until the middle of next month, giving rise to speculation the White House is delaying the bad news at least until Congress leaves town on its August 7 summer recess.

What happened to the most inclusive, transparent government evah!!! Oh, looks like somebody wants to get his sham of a universal healthcare deficit bill passed before showing the American public (aka the shareholders of the federal government) how badly their investment of tax dollars aren’t being managed properly.

Consider this: if those budget numbers looked good, would the White House postpone revealing them? Obama could use all the good news he can get at the moment, especially with two big-spending bills stalling in Congress.  If the deficit looked better than their May predictions, or even if it looked the same, those numbers would have already hit the front pages of newspapers across America and every network news broadcast, with the message that the worst has passed.

Good grief, it is honestly pathetic how people are still defending this guy as doing a job well done. The administration is outright LYING and cooking the books on the budget, yet people say the Dems have spending under control. WTF!

Look, I’ll be honest – I’m pro life. But I at least accept that Roe v. Wade is the law of the land. While I’m not expecting it to get overturned any day now, I do expect there to be some realistic boundaries when it comes to abortion. First, off abortion is not birth control or a means of population control for “the unfits” (as dictated by the women’s bc “heroine” Margaret Sanger, our recent crypt keeper on the Supreme Court, and Obama’s Science czar). Notice a theme there – all progressive (aka fascist) ideological advocates!

Anybackhandedbigot,  the Obamacare is coming through the pipeline and wouldn’t you know it but the lone presidential candidate that supported partial-birth abortions also thinks it appropriate for the taxpayers to support a 5 o’clock FREE ABORTION Give-away! (via Hotair) And who said that Obama’s stance on abortion wouldn’t matter??? Oh, right my lying-their-ass-off liberal friends who were drunk on kiizzzzzzzzz-oooo-laid!

After all, universal care means universal coverage, and pro-abortion Democrats believe that abortions are an integral part of gynecology. That isn’t limited to just the pro-abortion Democrats, either. Harry Reid, who advertises himself as “pro-life” said in March that he would vote for a health-care bill that provided taxpayer-funded abortions.

Here’s also the video from HotAir’s blog about it. Notice how Peter Orszag skirts away from the issue like a little biyatch…”Uhhhh, I’m not prepared to rule it out”

In case you didn’t know, that’s Beltway slang for “Yes, we are pursing that full force in the most partisan fashion possible.”

I can’t help but relate this to the gun issue. Even if you think that abortion is a constitutional right, does that mean the federal government should fund it? Ummm, N-O.  We also have constitutional rights to bear arms, but I haven’t received my .22 caliber in the mail courtesy of taxpayers. So why should taxpayers fund abortions???

Sure, the law of the land says that both are legal but just because something is deemed a constitutional right, doesn’t also mean that the right is funded as a collective for use by the general public. You have the right to carry out birth control measures, but that doesn’t mean Obama henchmen are patting you on the back with some Trojan men supplied by the taxpayer dime. Nor do I want the remote possibility of a government at the direction of a eugenics-fanatic science czar, influencing anyone on birth control matters: (via the Washington Examiner)

Of course, a government might require only implantation of the contraceptive capsule, leaving its removal to the individual’s discretion but requiring reimplantation after childbirth. Since having a child would require positive action (removal of the capsule), many more births would be prevented than in the reverse situation.

As Principal Edward Rooney would warn, “He’s just leading you down the primrose path!”  There is so much fine print in these slimy proposals for healthcare. Watch yo’ back, America! As for Obamacare, “I don’t trust this kid any further than I can throw him.”

Race-cards politics can come back to bite you in the asssssssssssssssss! Don’t it, Miss Boxter???? (via Breitbart TV)

This is what I’ve always found fascinating about the DNC party. They act like inherent characteristics such as race, gender, sexuality and even veteran-status are supposed to make people put aside their ideologies and common sense. Why? Oh, well because another person is the same skin color as you and therefore you must agree with him, even though he stated the exact opposite of what you believe. I mean that is so freakin’ condescending to not only somebody’s race, but their intelligence. Basically what Ms. Boxter (and the majority of liberals) are saying is that you don’t have the intelligence to come to your OWN conclusions and therefore must come to an agreement with people not on the merits of their ideas or character, but on the attributes of their race, gender and sexuality. Ri-@#$@#$@#$-diculus.

At the end, I love how she justifies her actions by being “someone who is married to a veteran.” Keep playing that identity-politics, Babs! What the FUCK does that have anything to do with being an excuse for the reason you literally just failed at a round of playing race-card politics???? Oh, it must be easier to forgive her actions because she’s married to a veteran. Well, Ms. Boxter, you’re also a member of the dumb bitch club and I guess then because of that I cannot forgive you – sorry the DBC overrules married to veteran status on mah’ judgments. (smirking)

Minorities continually support a party because they are sold on the idea that the DNC represents minorities. But all the DNC does when it’s in power is pass legislation and regulation that ultimately HURTS minorities not help them. In this clip for instance, minorities should ask themselves why are they supporting a political party that is in favor of passing energy policies that will hurt lower-economic groups (primarily of minority ethnicities) financially?

Or how about supporting a party that says it supports the blue collar working man? A party that passes economic policies which drives blue collar jobs out of the United States, but keeps their elitist cohorts in the lavish lifestyle their accustomed to. A party that says blue collar workers who own their own business and are financially stable must be taxed in order to spread the wealth around which in reality means giving more money to the government to keep giving Congress its five-figure pay raises.

And how about those who support the DNC because it says it supports illegal immigrants but continually allows for immigrants to be in a system that doesn’t pay them a fair wage under the myth that the jobs they have are ones “Americans don’t want.” So what is the DNC saying, illegal immigrants are taking the trash nobody wants therefore it’s okay to not pay them a legal, fair wage they would get if the businesses would be forced to not cut corners and immigration was properly monitored?

Why do minorities support the DNC, a party that eliminates effective voucher school programs despite the fact they show drastic improvements for kids from lower-economic and minority households. How does that support the advancement of minorities when the DNC eliminates educational programs that can make them better off financially in the future?

Wake up, minorities! This includes lower-economic classes, blacks, hispanics, women, etc….The DNC party is motivated by expanding the power of elites within that party. They rely on us falling for the old trick of them being a cape crusader in order for them to get elected and then once in office they consistently pass policies that advance only those within their elitist inner circles.

This is the party that plays on your desires of a better life and fear of oppression in society, and then leads you down the bath of being financially and ideologically chained to them with your vote. They act like your crusader against credit card companies, but refuse to tell you how they’re the party that put those companies in a position to offer you credit and take you to the cleaners with out of control lending rates. They don’t tell you they’re the ones in Congress literally forcing banks to trick you into borrowing money you can’t pay back with setup-to-fail-loans.

They sell you on the false premise that supporting the DNC will make you better off financially all the while they get rich, and your community remains ecnomically stagnate or decreases. Somebody needs to look at the fact that minority Democrat “leaders” rake in the millions while the people they “represent” continue to remain poor for more than 40+ years. Clearly, somebody is making it by selling the false dream bottled-up like old fashioned tonics or rain-drop cures. Jesse Jackson, I’m talking to yoooooo-hooooo!

This is a party that promises equality acceptance for you, but then demands that people treat you differently as if your race, gender or sexuality is a disability not just the inherent trait that it is.

And lastly, this is a party that would rather see more people on welfare government programs for financial dependence than working on legislation that promotes small business development in communities. Instead of creating jobs for the economy that would make people on their own financially stable, they continually insist to expand government welfare programs by stealing more money out of the economy. How is this representing the advancement of minorities?

And lastly, this is a party who just nominated a Supreme Court Jester (typo and it stays) that believes her race is what dictates the level of her intelligence. Wasn’t it Martin Luther King, Jr. that dreamed of a land where one wouldn’t be judged on the color of their skin, but on their character. How is it right for the DNC to make this a part of our constitutional ideology when their leaders advocate that race, not intellect, determines the judgment of one’s ability to be effective over another? Oh! And let’s not forget which current VP who’s a Gaffetastic-minority-representing Democrat had to say about Clarence Thomas (And this about about his OWN co-worker) -

“I think that the only reason Clarence Thomas is on the Court is because he is black. I don’t believe he could have won had he been white. And the reason is, I think it was a cynical ploy by President Bush.”

That’s not a platform of promoting multiculturalism, it’s a platform back-handedly promoting division, segregation and ethnocentrism.  And it’s time to put a stop to it.