Hell hath no fury like a former liberal woman.
Okay, one last post about bully-masked-in-”tolerance”- Perez Hilton, aka the intellectual dildo of the human race (Can I get a trademark in the hizzzz house?)
The other week the National Organization for Marriage ran an ad showcasing front and center how the left bullies, demonizes and belittles those who are guilty of nothing more than expressing an opinion (which is a freedom in this country under the 1st #$%@#$ Amendment for FREE SPEECH!)
Well, I guess Perez couldn’t handle the mirror put up to his bigot face and has been all over the place forcing YouTube to take down the video by stating its a violation of copyright. Ummm, WTF? Please, it’s only a copyright violation in his eyes because he’s being called out (properly) on his obnoxious behavior which is inappropriate and typical of the far left loons. I didn’t see him claiming copyright when NBC’s The Today Show (and other liberal MSM) ran the EXACT same clip but then interviewed him or Miss California Carrie Prejean immediately afterward.
But now a knight on a white horse all rode up in Patterico as he calls Perez’s bluff. (via Ace via Patterico)
It is clear that Hilton is embarrassed by what he said, and he is using a transparently frivolous copyright claim to try to squelch free speech about his ridiculous statements.
I’m not standing for it.
If Hilton sends me a DMCA takedown notice, I’m going to fight it — and I may sue him. I have never seen a clearer example of fair use in my life. The video shows a mere three seconds of Hilton calling Prejean a “dumb bitch” (the word is bleeped out). Later, there is a one-second clip of the same video confined to a small box at the bottom right-hand portion of the screen, as the announcer intones: “They want to silence opposition.” He had no idea how right he was.
Ooooooooooooh, snap! It’s a fight. A fight. Between the left and right!
Dare I say I’ve acquired another internet crush a la Steven Crowder and Michael Yon???? I’m sure liberals would challenge me when I say that these are real men women admire as opposed to sniveling weasels like Perez, Keith and that Daily Kos monkeyboy. (rolling eyes) Yes, liberals…I’d much prefer a guy who wants me to be near the underage limit (a la Keith) and to just sit there with my mouth shut making sure I don’t do anything feministic like voice a mature, intelligent opinion based on facts. You know, as opposed to conservative men who can appreciate an ALPHA Female (and a boisterous one at that). Go Democrats for women’s rights!
Anyworthlessnitwit, I guess the Keith-Olbermann-defined Intellectual Titan can’t handle it when the pressure comes back to his dumb biaytch comment in full force. Riddle me this – if you’re an intellectual titan shouldn’t you be able to handle with class and maturity a little intellectual opposition? Hmmmm…..
Here’s the video…if you’ve got a blog, Facebook page or twitter account – post aaaaaaaaaway, maties!
The ranting and raving of a woman formally brainwashed under the liberal agenda. Through investigation, commentary and sarcasm about government, this woman is breaking free of the hypocritical liberal party that tries to manipulate women into believing only they can represent women’s rights. Get informed, get free, get Un-Liberaled! This blog does not endorse any particular candidate or party - although if I did, I most likely wouldn’t endorse a liberal candidate. For instance, Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) or as I like to call her Smancy Pelotox would not get my vote. Comprende? Good. Hope you enjoy the rants! :)
Dan Kauffman
May 4th, 2009 at 4:37 pm
I have that video posted, along with it I have a video of Obama stating that in his view marriage is between a man and a woman and I ask the question
If Miss Prejean’s opinion can justly subject her to condemnation then her detractors are saying the same thing about the President?
Lisa
November 30th, 2009 at 1:19 pm
Just wondering if you knew google ads links your “Gay Marriage” category to gay activism sites? Sad.
unliberaledwoman
November 30th, 2009 at 2:56 pm
I typically don’t care if Google links a certain category in a way not representative of what some deem contextually correct. It’s Google’s prerogative as a business to classify links as they so choose (or their algorithm chooses which is most likely the case if you know anything about SEO/SEM).
Personally I think gay marriage advocates need to hear an opposing side to the gay marriage issue just as gay marriage opponents need to hear from gay advocates. Hearing different viewpoints is what challenges us as a society to expand our critical thinking. If gay marriage advocates don’t like what this blog says they can express their freedom to click the ‘Back’ button in my opinion.