<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Silence The Bully Perez Hilton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.unliberaledwoman.com/silence-the-bully-perez-hilton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.unliberaledwoman.com/silence-the-bully-perez-hilton/</link>
	<description>Hell hath no fury like a former liberal woman.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:26:24 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: unliberaledwoman</title>
		<link>http://www.unliberaledwoman.com/silence-the-bully-perez-hilton/comment-page-1/#comment-4405</link>
		<dc:creator>unliberaledwoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unliberaledwoman.com/?p=1952#comment-4405</guid>
		<description>I typically don&#039;t care if Google links a certain category in a way not representative of what some deem contextually correct. It&#039;s Google&#039;s prerogative as a business to classify links as they so choose (or their algorithm chooses which is most likely the case if you know anything about SEO/SEM). 

Personally I think gay marriage advocates need to hear an opposing side to the gay marriage issue just as gay marriage opponents need to hear from gay advocates. Hearing different viewpoints is what challenges us as a society to expand our critical thinking. If gay marriage advocates don&#039;t like what this blog says they can express their freedom to click the &#039;Back&#039; button in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I typically don&#8217;t care if Google links a certain category in a way not representative of what some deem contextually correct. It&#8217;s Google&#8217;s prerogative as a business to classify links as they so choose (or their algorithm chooses which is most likely the case if you know anything about SEO/SEM). </p>
<p>Personally I think gay marriage advocates need to hear an opposing side to the gay marriage issue just as gay marriage opponents need to hear from gay advocates. Hearing different viewpoints is what challenges us as a society to expand our critical thinking. If gay marriage advocates don&#8217;t like what this blog says they can express their freedom to click the &#8216;Back&#8217; button in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.unliberaledwoman.com/silence-the-bully-perez-hilton/comment-page-1/#comment-4402</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unliberaledwoman.com/?p=1952#comment-4402</guid>
		<description>Just wondering if you knew google ads links your &quot;Gay Marriage&quot; category to gay activism sites?  Sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wondering if you knew google ads links your &#8220;Gay Marriage&#8221; category to gay activism sites?  Sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Kauffman</title>
		<link>http://www.unliberaledwoman.com/silence-the-bully-perez-hilton/comment-page-1/#comment-476</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Kauffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 23:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unliberaledwoman.com/?p=1952#comment-476</guid>
		<description>I have that video posted, along with it I have a video of Obama stating that in his view marriage is between a man and a woman and I ask the question

If Miss Prejean&#039;s opinion can justly subject her to condemnation then her detractors are saying the same thing about the President?  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have that video posted, along with it I have a video of Obama stating that in his view marriage is between a man and a woman and I ask the question</p>
<p>If Miss Prejean&#8217;s opinion can justly subject her to condemnation then her detractors are saying the same thing about the President?  <img src='http://www.unliberaledwoman.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
