Anyways, here’s Helen defending what she meant when she referred to “so-called terrrorists” during Obama’s media conference last week. Because you know, there’s really no actual terrorists according to Thomas, they’re just misunderstood freedom fighters.

Click here to view the embedded video.

Not surprising but Thomas totally misses the point that most of these “freedom fighters” are not fighting for the freedom of citizens of their own country even. And it’s not for the free will of the country’s citizens, but the right to go back to oppressing those citizens.  I’m sorry but when extremists use suicide bombings and conduct mass murders through violence in public areas as a means to further their oppressive religious agenda that is not being a freedom fighter. And when other governments and citizens stand up to fight back against those extremists to prevent further slayings of innocent citizens, that’s doesn’t equate their defensive actions with the violence conducted by those “freedom fighters.” Last time I checked, Uday and Qusay Hussein’s rape rooms under their father’s regime in Iraq were not a means for establishing women’s rights.

Regardless, as a journalist, especially one on the highest national level, it makes Thomas look professionally irresponsible and unethical the more she continues to be an advocate. If she wants to be the PR head honcho for these “so-called terrorists” then go work for a liberal think tank like the Theresa Heinz-Kerry-funded Brookings Institute. Don’t sit on a pedastal of best practices in journalism while going against all objective-based principles of the field.

During tonight’s press conference, Helen once again proved why she is clearly biased to the far left (via HotAir) and assured me there’s a good reason my political views don’t side with the grainy old witch out of the Hanzel & Gretyl story – yeah, that’s right I went there.  Her question was almost the top eye-roll-inducing question of the night, but luckily she got upstaged by “How do you feel about Arod admitting to using roids?” question guy.

And reading the post at HotAir makes me miss Tony Snow – now that was an incredible press secretary. He knew how to handle the press unlike our current fabulous and transparent appointment at secretary.  Here’s a glimpse back at being a great press secretary. RIP, Tony!

But at least McCain (R-AZ) and Pence (R-IN) are starting to be more vocal in their opposition (via HotAir.com) with logical debate points. On a side note, where was THIS McCain on the campaign trail? I would have liked to seen more of this, but I think he was fighting such a huge uphill battle as is. McCain did warn us in the debates about Obama’s spending habits with example after example of Obama’s history with proposed pork projects. Obama retorted back that he’s a “pay as you go” legislature. Heh.

In the first clip I love how Pence shuts down the commentary on the economist “supporting” the porkulus. Turns out economists are able to change their mind or that some liberal-biased media were trying to skew context to illustrate support where there is none. Is it me or I thought the campaigning/advocacy ended months ago. Honestly, when are the media going to get back to objective, investigative journalism? Or should we start calling Medill School of Journalism at Northwesterm Medill School of PR???

And McCain brings up a good point about what are we going to do when the bill comes due. Passing this down the line to the next generation doesn’t make us a very responsible nation. It’s like how the older generation of politicians put funding of the failed Social Security system on my generation and I don’t know one person my age who speaks favorably about that topic.

So what will our children and grandchildren think of our generation down the line knowing we purposely put them in a corner forcing them to pay off $1 trillion debt we didn’t need???  If it’s to create jobs, I don’t see justifying paying $600,000 – $200,000 per job created, the estimate on the ROI of job creation through this porkulus. That doesn’t make sense even from a business standpoint.  I guess we’ll just have to wait and see if this boondoggle extravaganza actually passes.

I dated a guy from Israel once, and although that relationship did not last I do believe I was meant to date him because had it not been for him I would not have had my eyes opened to how many Muslim-extremists in the Middle East actually behave when a CNN camera is not present. I mean he had loads of these truth-revealing documents and videos. Which brings me to today lesson on why jihadists deserve no sympathy, courtesy of Jihadist Joe: How to Properly Beat Your DisobedientWife (via AtlasShrugs). In this case disobedience means leaving the house or giving your husband an opinion he doesn’t agree with. Toooooooooooooolerance!!!!

I know these regimes were typically based in religion and people say we should let religion be. I get that, but it doesn’t make it right. If that was happening in our country it would make the national news. People outcry over when polygamists marry young girls but then also turn around and say we have no business helping women in other countries.  While we cannot change religious-extremists overnight we should at least support our troops who are doing what they can to install a stable government that is trying to create a society where at least many of these women can have a chance, just one chance to not be oppressed for the rest of their lives. What I don’t get though is when liberal politicians get up and talk about being the party of women’s rights but then turn around and defend creeps like this. Just some food for thought.

I first saw this video on PerezHilton.com, a very popular gossip site. While Perez Hilton is attempting to “inform” his readers it worries me that his 7 million+ readers/day are getting a one-sided view intentionally. But the thing I’ve learned from being a reformed liberal is that far-left propaganda is based on the assumption people will just run with the one-sided shock value and not get the full facts on the entire story. It’s like far-left propagandists expect you to BE STUPID because if you didn’t just listen to their skewed, misguided “facts” then you probably wouldn’t be behind their cause.

To get the facts, check out this article (via HotAir.com). Ed Morrissey has been writing on this for a while and I appreciate his objective presentation on the facts of this topic.

By the way, Palin’s strategy worked.  Biologists in the state’s Fish and Game Department estimate that the caribou herds increased to 6500 this year, thanks to the reduced threat from wolves.  The birth rate went from one calf per 100 cows to 39 calves per 100 cows, which will help herd growth for the next several years. Another season without the aerial hunt might have wiped out the caribou herds altogether.

Most importantly, this “controversial” initiative was enacted in 2003 (yes, prior to Palin’s term) and was done so to protect many other species – Caribou, Moose, etc. Are somehow wolves more important than the other wildlife? If you’re so opposed to this method, what then can you offer as a more cost-effective means to decrease the wolf population – waiting to catch them with our bare hands?  Come on people, be realistic! If Judd wanted to really do a public service she should either get educated on the facts or keep her mouth shut.

Yes, she said every month that we don’t have an economic recovery package the U.S. suddenly has 500,000,000 people out of work. Riddle me this, Pelotox, what’s that darn Census Bureau got the U.S. population at again?  Only 300 million? Oh, you made a mistake, Pelotox???  La-di-freakin’-DUH!  But thanks for not only never retracting any of your errors smears, but also serving as a glaring example as to why I don’t trust far-left politicians.

Call me crazy but I don’t know one single person who’s lost a job since this recession started.  It’s not to say I haven’t heard of companies cutting jobs or scaling back on their hiring efforts. I realize that this is happening, but the idea that the U.S. unemployment scare tactics are at the drastic levels politicians like Pelotox would have you believe is a farce.  All Obama and Pelotox are doing is their ABCs – Always-Be-Closing! They’ve got to sell this porkulus to the people because now it’s their reputation on the line. When (not if, when) this porkulus blows up in their faces they can’t effectively just blame President Bush like they did everything during the campaign and they can’t blame Republicans in Congress as they stand together opposed taking many Democrats onto their side.

What really gets me about Behar is that she can always dish it out but the minute somebody gives her a dose of her own medicine she becomes unraveled at the seams like a 2 year-old who just found out no, they cannot get whatever they want. Here’s a prime example when John Ziegler comes on the view to talk about his new documentary. Now granted Ziegler’s documentary is controversial (although I COMPLETELY agree with it), but to excuse Behar’s far-left ranting like a child because she came across a far-right debate point is weak.  For instance, Behar defends the media criticizing Palin about her pregnant daughter because it somehow goes back to Palin’s issue on teaching abstinence programs in schools and that it makes Palin a hypocrite.  Behar doesn’t seem to care that what Bristol Palin decides to do with her boyfriend (like having pre-marital sex and getting preggers) in her private life is not a direct link to whether public policy, like abstinence programs, are effective or not.  But using Behar’s illogical logic, how come she never gets on the media for not criticizing Obama who supports public education funding but then sends his daughters to private schools????  Or doesn’t call Obama out on his hypocrisy? I know why she doesn’t pipe up then – because she doesn’t know what the FUCK she’s talking about.

Here’s the two parts of the interview. To sit back and see Joy lose it – 2nd clip around :30. Ooooooh, those feathers getting ruffled! Loves it!