Hell hath no fury like a former liberal woman.
Hannah Giles went undercover to expose the liberal thugs who found no hesitation nor anything wrong with US citizens oppressing young girls into child sex trafficking. Yet, I find it amusing that leftists would probably consider Giles not for women’s rights if she is pro-life being a conservative, similar to their ridiculous thought process behind denouncing Sarah Palin.
Giles should be given praise by organizations like NOW or a Pulitzer prize in journalism for exposing this type of criminal behavior against young girls. Instead she’ll probably be labeled an extremist by the likes of Gloria Steinem. What a shame.
The ranting and raving of a woman formally brainwashed under the liberal agenda. Through investigation, commentary and sarcasm about government, this woman is breaking free of the hypocritical liberal party that tries to manipulate women into believing only they can represent women’s rights. Get informed, get free, get Un-Liberaled! This blog does not endorse any particular candidate or party - although if I did, I most likely wouldn’t endorse a liberal candidate. For instance, Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) or as I like to call her Smancy Pelotox would not get my vote. Comprende? Good. Hope you enjoy the rants! :)
HogKiller
September 20th, 2009 at 4:45 pm
Ok, let me get this straight. NOW and the rest of them scream for equality and breaking the ‘glass’ ceiling. How Women are second class, at best, citizens. Then along comes Sarah Palin who is articulate, damn good looking and the woman of every mans dreams, she hunts, fishes, ….. you get the idea and the Fem Libbers toss her to the wolves. Now Hannah Giles comes along, foxier than sin, taking a chance to show that a ‘community organization’ is willing to help in the sex slavery of underage girls and the Women Libbers do what? Oh NOTHING! I’m guessing that the NOW’s and the likes of them are, at the best giving lip service to ‘woman’s rights’. I’m guessing like the Progressives, say one thing and work for the slavery of human kind.
Amy P.
September 20th, 2009 at 9:21 pm
See, the thing is they believe “women’s rights” mean two things:
1) The ability to act like men and neuter men in the process
and
2) To sleep around and have as much consequence-free sex as possible.
The first, of course, is total crap because the second you say or do something that wouldn’t offend a guy but offends a feminist, they suddenly turn into delicate flowers who aren’t like men and need the State to defend them by passing more sexual harassment laws and hate crime legislation.
The second is only slightly more nuanced. They want consequence-free sex (i.e., abortion and free birth control) all under the guise of “choice”, but the second a woman (like Sarah Palin) has kids (especially a special-needs kid like Trig) and a career, it’s “back in the kitchen for you, missy!” or if a woman like Michelle Duggar has 19 kids – suddenly it’s not a “choice” Mrs. Duggar made but something she’s being forced to do.
They wouldn’t dare criticize a woman who had 19 abortions, but they have no problem making crude jokes about a woman who has 19 children.
They want women, ultimately, to be slave to a progressive feminist liberal ideology. Which is why they treat women like Sarah Palin so badly – it’s the modern-day version of a lashing so the other slaves of feminism know what happens when they try to leave the plantation and to keep us women from thinking for ourselves.