<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This is A Woman Fighting for Women&#8217;s Rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.unliberaledwoman.com/this-is-a-woman-fighting-for-womens-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.unliberaledwoman.com/this-is-a-woman-fighting-for-womens-rights/</link>
	<description>Hell hath no fury like a former liberal woman.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 03:09:42 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Amy P.</title>
		<link>http://www.unliberaledwoman.com/this-is-a-woman-fighting-for-womens-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-3876</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 04:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unliberaledwoman.com/?p=2828#comment-3876</guid>
		<description>See, the thing is they believe &quot;women&#039;s rights&quot; mean two things:

1) The ability to act like men and neuter men in the process

and 

2) To sleep around and have as much consequence-free sex as possible.

The first, of course, is total crap because the second you say or do something that wouldn&#039;t offend a guy but offends a feminist, they suddenly turn into delicate flowers who aren&#039;t like men and need the State to defend them by passing more sexual harassment laws and hate crime legislation.

The second is only slightly more nuanced.  They want consequence-free sex (i.e., abortion and free birth control) all under the guise of &quot;choice&quot;, but the second a woman (like Sarah Palin) has kids (especially a special-needs kid like Trig) and a career, it&#039;s &quot;back in the kitchen for you, missy!&quot; or if a woman like Michelle Duggar has 19 kids - suddenly it&#039;s not a &quot;choice&quot; Mrs. Duggar made but something she&#039;s being forced to do.

They wouldn&#039;t dare criticize a woman who had 19 abortions, but they have no problem making crude jokes about a woman who has 19 children.

They want women, ultimately, to be slave to a progressive feminist liberal ideology.  Which is why they treat women like Sarah Palin so badly - it&#039;s the modern-day version of a lashing so the other slaves of feminism know what happens when they try to leave the plantation and to keep us women from thinking for ourselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, the thing is they believe &#8220;women&#8217;s rights&#8221; mean two things:</p>
<p>1) The ability to act like men and neuter men in the process</p>
<p>and </p>
<p>2) To sleep around and have as much consequence-free sex as possible.</p>
<p>The first, of course, is total crap because the second you say or do something that wouldn&#8217;t offend a guy but offends a feminist, they suddenly turn into delicate flowers who aren&#8217;t like men and need the State to defend them by passing more sexual harassment laws and hate crime legislation.</p>
<p>The second is only slightly more nuanced.  They want consequence-free sex (i.e., abortion and free birth control) all under the guise of &#8220;choice&#8221;, but the second a woman (like Sarah Palin) has kids (especially a special-needs kid like Trig) and a career, it&#8217;s &#8220;back in the kitchen for you, missy!&#8221; or if a woman like Michelle Duggar has 19 kids &#8211; suddenly it&#8217;s not a &#8220;choice&#8221; Mrs. Duggar made but something she&#8217;s being forced to do.</p>
<p>They wouldn&#8217;t dare criticize a woman who had 19 abortions, but they have no problem making crude jokes about a woman who has 19 children.</p>
<p>They want women, ultimately, to be slave to a progressive feminist liberal ideology.  Which is why they treat women like Sarah Palin so badly &#8211; it&#8217;s the modern-day version of a lashing so the other slaves of feminism know what happens when they try to leave the plantation and to keep us women from thinking for ourselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HogKiller</title>
		<link>http://www.unliberaledwoman.com/this-is-a-woman-fighting-for-womens-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-3873</link>
		<dc:creator>HogKiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 23:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unliberaledwoman.com/?p=2828#comment-3873</guid>
		<description>Ok, let me get this straight.  NOW and the rest of them scream for equality and breaking the &#039;glass&#039; ceiling.  How Women are second class, at best, citizens. Then along comes Sarah Palin who is articulate, damn good looking and the woman of every mans dreams, she hunts, fishes, ..... you get the idea and the Fem Libbers toss her to the wolves.  Now Hannah Giles comes along, foxier than sin, taking a chance to show that a &#039;community organization&#039; is willing to help in the sex slavery of underage girls and the Women Libbers do what?  Oh NOTHING! I&#039;m guessing that the NOW&#039;s and the likes of them are, at the best giving lip service to &#039;woman&#039;s rights&#039;.  I&#039;m guessing like the Progressives, say one thing and work for the slavery of human kind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, let me get this straight.  NOW and the rest of them scream for equality and breaking the &#8216;glass&#8217; ceiling.  How Women are second class, at best, citizens. Then along comes Sarah Palin who is articulate, damn good looking and the woman of every mans dreams, she hunts, fishes, &#8230;.. you get the idea and the Fem Libbers toss her to the wolves.  Now Hannah Giles comes along, foxier than sin, taking a chance to show that a &#8216;community organization&#8217; is willing to help in the sex slavery of underage girls and the Women Libbers do what?  Oh NOTHING! I&#8217;m guessing that the NOW&#8217;s and the likes of them are, at the best giving lip service to &#8216;woman&#8217;s rights&#8217;.  I&#8217;m guessing like the Progressives, say one thing and work for the slavery of human kind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

